data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa513/fa513b3f057c9e494632403295aeceafe3608292" alt=""
How many activist sites do we encounter in a regular web surfing day? I have to admit, I'm a little out of my comfort zone here, because i have very little experience with these sites. i also have to admit, I get a little guarded when talking about activist sites. Sometimes I feel like these sites are a tad too paranoid, thriving on "Big Brother" conspiracy theories. That being said, there are plenty of great causes that many activists work toward. The question is, how effective are these sites really? Very similar to Social Justice sites, these are often less visited than commercialized sites. Why is that? What makes these sites generally less visited? How can these causes get more attention? Are the people who visit these sites any more likely to contribute to the cause than if the activist group just formed a Facebook Fanpage? Yes, these sites are meant to convince and inform, but how convincing are they really? How can such a site encourage and incite return visits? What makes people visit, and perhaps more importantly, what makes them return to activist websites?
The Electronic Frontier Foundation we were instructed to look at discusses the rights of internet blogger, privacy for readers and a number of other digital/web based legal issues. The internet age has opened this can of worms, but how can you judge, in a world of free information, which of these rights are ones you want to back? This site advocates for many ideas and ranges through a number of rights. A viewer of the site might have various opinions on the many issues. Do you think this is a wise choice, or will some opinions draw in revisits while discouraging others? Opinions go hand in hand with activist sites. Does introducing so many different issues is the site helping or hurting itself? What is effective here and what, if anything, is unsuccessful?